Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql
Date
Msg-id AANLkTik1Y1vc3QoW0mnA-fHbnL11p7hWAsx4cKa5oPkq@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> Detoasting on first usage, ie. exec_eval_datum(), seems the best to me.
>> Compared to detoasting on assignment, it avoids the performance
>> regression if the value is never used, and I don't think checking if the
>> value is toasted at every exec_eval_datum() call adds too much overhead.
>
> The arguments that were made against this were about maintenance costs
> and code footprint.  Claims about performance are not really relevant,
> especially when they're entirely unsupported by evidence.

How much evidence do you need to the effect that detoasting a value
that's never used will hurt performance?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Include WAL in base backup