On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2011-03-20 05:44, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, I'm not going to be able to reproduce this here, and my test
>> setup didn't show a clear regression. I can try beating on it some
>> more, but... Any chance you could rerun your test with the latest
>> master-branch code, and perhaps also with the patch I proposed
>> upthread to remove a branch from the section protection by
>> SyncRepLock? I can't really tell from reading the emails you linked
>> what was responsible for the slowdowns and speedups, and it is unclear
>> to me how much impact my recent changes actually had.
>
> No problem. Could you tell me the name of the "remove a branch from the
> section protection by SyncRepLock" ? patch, or perhaps a message-link?
> Upthread I see sync-standbys-defined-rearrangement.patch but also two
> sync-rep-wait-fixes.
Thanks! The things I'd like to see compared are:
- performance as of commit e148443ddd95cd29edf4cc1de6188eb9cee029c5
- performance as of current git master
- performance as of current git master with
sync-standbys-defined-rearrangement applied
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
