On 2011-03-21 02:05, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Yeb Havinga<yebhavinga@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2011-03-20 05:44, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Hmm, I'm not going to be able to reproduce this here, and my test
>>> setup didn't show a clear regression. I can try beating on it some
>>> more, but... Any chance you could rerun your test with the latest
>>> master-branch code, and perhaps also with the patch I proposed
>>> upthread to remove a branch from the section protection by
>>> SyncRepLock? I can't really tell from reading the emails you linked
>>> what was responsible for the slowdowns and speedups, and it is unclear
>>> to me how much impact my recent changes actually had.
>> No problem. Could you tell me the name of the "remove a branch from the
>> section protection by SyncRepLock" ? patch, or perhaps a message-link?
>> Upthread I see sync-standbys-defined-rearrangement.patch but also two
>> sync-rep-wait-fixes.
> Thanks! The things I'd like to see compared are:
pgbench -i -s 50 test
Two runs of "pgbench -c 10 -M prepared -T 600 test" with 1 sync standby
- server configs etc were mailed upthread.
> - performance as of commit e148443ddd95cd29edf4cc1de6188eb9cee029c5
1158 and 1306 (avg 1232)
> - performance as of current git master
1181 and 1280 (avg 1230,5)
> - performance as of current git master with
> sync-standbys-defined-rearrangement applied
1152 and 1269 (avg 1210,5)
--
Yeb Havinga
http://www.mgrid.net/
Mastering Medical Data
