On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:30 AM, David Christensen <david@endpoint.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2011, at 6:17 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>>>> I assume having psql support multiple -f files is not a high priority or
>>>> something we don't want.
>>>
>>> IIRC, nobody objected to the basic concept, and it seems useful. I
>>> thought we were pretty close to committing something along those lines
>>> at one point, actually. I don't remember exactly where the wheels
>>> came off.
>>>
>>> Maybe a TODO?
>>
>> Added to the psql section:
>>
>> |Allow processing of multiple -f (file) options
>
>
> The original patch was a fairly trivial WIP one, which I started working on to add support for multiple -c flags
interspersedas well. I haven't looked at it in quite some time, though; there had been some concerns about how it
workedin single-transaction mode and some other issues I don't recall off the top of my head.
>
> On this topic, I was thinking that it may be useful to provide an alternate multi-file syntax, a la git, with any
argumentfollowing '--' in the argument list being interpreted as a file to process; i.e.,:
>
> $ psql -U user [option] database -- file1.sql file2.sql file3.sql
>
> This would allow things like shell expansion to work as expected:
>
> $ ls
> 01-schema.sql 02-data1.sql 03-fixups.sql
>
> $ psql database -- *.sql
>
> etc.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
