On Mar 11, 2011, at 6:17 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>>> I assume having psql support multiple -f files is not a high priority or
>>> something we don't want.
>>
>> IIRC, nobody objected to the basic concept, and it seems useful. I
>> thought we were pretty close to committing something along those lines
>> at one point, actually. I don't remember exactly where the wheels
>> came off.
>>
>> Maybe a TODO?
>
> Added to the psql section:
>
> |Allow processing of multiple -f (file) options
The original patch was a fairly trivial WIP one, which I started working on to add support for multiple -c flags
interspersedas well. I haven't looked at it in quite some time, though; there had been some concerns about how it
workedin single-transaction mode and some other issues I don't recall off the top of my head.
On this topic, I was thinking that it may be useful to provide an alternate multi-file syntax, a la git, with any
argumentfollowing '--' in the argument list being interpreted as a file to process; i.e.,:
$ psql -U user [option] database -- file1.sql file2.sql file3.sql
This would allow things like shell expansion to work as expected:
$ ls
01-schema.sql 02-data1.sql 03-fixups.sql
$ psql database -- *.sql
etc.
Regards,
David
--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
david@endpoint.com
