Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix various possible problems with synchronous replication. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix various possible problems with synchronous replication.
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=k7=gopZmdyvL_YvnGtaiMABhgPjC5=D9kXNns@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix various possible problems with synchronous replication.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix various possible problems with synchronous replication.
List pgsql-hackers
On 17 March 2011 17:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> errdetail("The transaction has already been committed locally but
>> might have not been replicated to the standby.")));
>> errdetail("The transaction has committed locally, but may not have
>> replicated to the standby.")));
>>
>> Could we have these saying precisely the same thing?
>
> Yeah.  Which is better?

Personally I prefer the 2nd.  It reads better somehow.

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: why is max standby delay only 35 minutes?