Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use symbolic names not octal constants for file permission flags - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use symbolic names not octal constants for file permission flags
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=YHjgfRmN__E+othsHg_QPXJwF_E5cL50cMPrm@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use symbolic names not octal constants for file permission flags  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use symbolic names not octal constants for file permission flags  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 18:46, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 17:55, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> 1. How did all those pre-existing references to S_IRXWU compile?
>
>> Yeah, that's weird. IIRC (I stopped looking for the moment, need a
>> step back) some of them were protected by #ifndef WIN32, but not all
>> of them..
>
> The lightbulb just went on: in win32.h,
>
> #define mkdir(a,b)      mkdir(a)
>
> I didn't go through in complete detail, but I'll bet all the "working"
> instances are in mkdir calls, or else inside #ifndef WIN32.

Ah, that certainly looks like a smoking gun.


> I think we can just #define the other cases as zeroes.  I'm not sure why
> you think that's an issue for open --- the privileges don't exist.

Hmm. I was/am worried about any case that specifies *just* one of the
permissions that don't exist. That'll leave it at zero, whereas the
correct one might be the user-only version of whatever (read/write)
was given.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use symbolic names not octal constants for file permission flags
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use symbolic names not octal constants for file permission flags