On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 16:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes:
>> Speaking of which, pltcl stores the trigger reloid instead of a flag
>> (it also uses tg_reloid in the internal proname). It seems a tad
>> excessive to have one function *per* trigger table.
>
> Surely, removing the internal name's dependency on the istrigger flag is
> wrong. If you're going to maintain separate hash entries at the pltcl
> level, why would you want to risk collisions underneath that?
Good catch. I was basing it off plperl which uses the same proname
for both (sprintf(subname, %s__%u", prodesc->proname, fn_oid)). Its
OK for plperl because when we compile we save a reference to it and
use that directly (more or less). The name does not really matter.
