On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:12, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well, do you want to revise this and submit a stripped-down version?
>> I'm not averse to adding things that are required by the standard and
>> won't cause backward compatibility problems later.
Sure. I'll remove collect() function. I can also remove syntax support,
but it requires rework for documentation (for, IS A SET operator to
is_a_set function), so I'd like to wait for the final consensus a bit more.
> The documentation for trim_array() in the current patch version is
> pretty terrible. The documentation describe it as having the prototype
> trim_array(anyarray), but it's called in the example as
> trim(integer[], integer) - two arguments vs. one.
Oops, it's just my mistake. trim(anyarray, integer) is correct.
> Also the docs don't
> say how it decides how many elements to remove, or what happens to a
> multi-dimensional array.
I wrote the description below in the patch:
+ In <function>array_sort</>, <function>set</>, and <function>trim_array</>
+ functions, input arrays are always flattened into one-dimensional arrays.
+ In addition, the lower bounds of the arrays are adjusted to 1.
I'm not sure what is the consistent behavior for MD arrays. For example,
array_concat() is very strict, but <@ and && operators don't care about
the dimensions. I interpreted the second argument for trim_array() as
a number of "elements", but of course we can redefine it as a number of
"rows" for MD arrays.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
