Re: Static snapshot data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Manfred Koizar
Subject Re: Static snapshot data
Date
Msg-id 9hqscvoej3vqqv3fdgvm5i0brq9gm210ch@4ax.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Static snapshot data  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Static snapshot data
Re: Static snapshot data
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 23 May 2003 13:15:07 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:
>[good reasons for having SERIALIZABLE subtransactions in READ
> COMMITTED main transactions]

All I'm saying is if we can have  (1) a simple version with some restrictions for 7.4 and     SERIALIZABLE
subtransactionsfor 7.5 or  (2) nothing for 7.4 and everything for 7.5
 
I'd rather have (1);  as long as we don't cause incompatibilities, of
course.

>We already have START TRANSACTION [...]

Great.  I was so used to BEGIN that I didn't even think of trying \h.:-/

ServusManfred


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum analyze corrupts database
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Plan B for log rotation support: borrow Apache code