Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Python 3.11 vs. Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Python 3.11 vs. Postgres
Date
Msg-id 9f0a00b3-02a5-4a69-44c1-f59d3cd5121a@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Python 3.11 vs. Postgres  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Python 3.11 vs. Postgres
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 24.11.21 04:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> According to [1], we need to stop including Python's <eval.h>.
> I've not checked whether this creates any backwards-compatibility
> issues.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023272

See attached patch.  The minimum Python version for this change is 2.4, 
which is the oldest version supported by PG10, so we can backpatch this 
to all live branches.
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequence's value can be rollback after a crashed recovery.
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Mop-up from Test::More version change patch