Re: Python 3.11 vs. Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Python 3.11 vs. Postgres
Date
Msg-id 166832.1637775591@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Python 3.11 vs. Postgres  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 24.11.21 04:07, Tom Lane wrote:
>> According to [1], we need to stop including Python's <eval.h>.

> See attached patch.  The minimum Python version for this change is 2.4, 
> which is the oldest version supported by PG10, so we can backpatch this 
> to all live branches.

LGTM.  Tested with v10 and prairiedog's Python 2.4.1.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Split xlog.c
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c