On 2020-09-03 12:14, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:11:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> From what I can see on this thread, we could just remove currtid() per
>> the arguments of the RETURNING ctid clause supported since PG 8.2, but
>> it would make more sense to me to just remove both currtid/currtid2()
>> at once.
>
> The CF bot is complaining, so here is a rebase for the main patch.
> Opinions are welcome about the arguments of upthread.
It appears that currtid2() is still used, so we ought to keep it.
