On 01.09.23 12:44, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am not sure what you have in mind, but IMO any solution would live
> better as long as a solution is:
> - not linked to hba.c, handled in a separate code path.
> - linked to all configuration files where comments are supported, if
> need be.
If I understood you correctly: You mean an independent feature that i.e.
gets raw lines and parses the inline #comments.
Doing so we could indeed avoid the trouble of messing around with the
hba.c logic, and it would be accessible to other config files. Very
interesting thought! It sounds like a much more elegant solution.
> Perhaps others have more opinions.
> --
> Michael
If I hear no objections, I'll try to sketch it as you suggested.
Thanks again for the feedback
Jim
