On 6/23/20 6:32 AM, Jason Ralph wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> PostgreSQL 11.8 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.7
> 20120313 (R
>
> ed Hat 4.4.7-23), 64-bit
>
> I am planning an update on a table with 20Million records, I have been
> researching the best practices. I will remove all indexes and foreign
> keys prior to the update, however I am not sure if I should use a
> transaction or not.
>
> My thought process is that a transaction would be easier to recover if
> something fails, however it would take more time to write to the WAL log
> in a transaction.
Unless this is an UNLOGGED table WALs will be written.
>
> Would it make sense to make a back up of the table then execute update
> without a transaction? How would you guys do it?
You could break it down into multiple transactions if there is way to
specify ranges of records.
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Jason Ralph*
>
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for
> the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
> delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be
> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be
> intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or
> contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any
> errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a
> result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please
> request a hard-copy version.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
