UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or not? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jason Ralph
Subject UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or not?
Date
Msg-id BN7PR04MB382623164C18461A1DDB6242D0940@BN7PR04MB3826.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or not?
Re: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or not?
Re: UPDATE on 20 Million Records Transaction or not?
List pgsql-general

Hello List,

PostgreSQL 11.8 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (R

ed Hat 4.4.7-23), 64-bit

 

I am planning an update on a table with 20Million records, I have been researching the best practices.  I will remove all indexes and foreign keys prior to the update, however I am not sure if I should use a transaction or not.

My thought process is that a transaction would be easier to recover if something fails, however it would take more time to write to the WAL log in a transaction. 

 

Would it make sense to make a back up of the table then execute update without a transaction? How would you guys do it?

 

Thanks,

 

Jason Ralph

 

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Edu Gargiulo
Date:
Subject: pg_dump empty tables
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump empty tables