Re: pg_amcheck contrib application - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Date
Msg-id 9EC8F8A5-9173-4600-8776-86D50C19A294@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_amcheck contrib application  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: pg_amcheck contrib application  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On Apr 30, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> toast value %u was expected to end at chunk %d, but ended while
>> expecting chunk %d
>>
>> i.e. same as the currently-committed code, except for changing "ended
>> at" to "ended while expecting."
>
> I find the grammar of this new formulation anomalous for hard to articulate reasons not quite the same as but akin to
mismatchedverb aspect. 

After further reflection, no other verbiage seems any better.  I'd say go ahead and commit it this way.

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs