Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
Date
Msg-id 9D458AE9-9C62-4682-9B57-DA6F3D5DF83C@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:05 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> Robert Haas wrote:
>> I could live with the equals signs, but the use of parentheses seems
>> weird and inconsistent with normal english usage (which permits
>> parentheses as a means of making parenthetical comments).
> But it is consistent with people seeing:
>
> Seq Scan on foo (cost=0.00..155.00 rows=10000 width=4)
>
> Which seems to be what was being emulated here.  I though that was  
> pretty reasonable given this is a related feature.

It's not the same at all. The essence of a parenthetical phrase is  
that it can be omitted without turning what's left into nonsense - and  
in fact we have COSTS OFF, which does just that. Omitting only the  
parenthesized portions of the proposed output would not be sensible.

...Robert 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] executor and slru dtrace probes
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, some small issues