Re: Different compression methods for FPI - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey Borodin
Subject Re: Different compression methods for FPI
Date
Msg-id 9C189C4C-167E-47B5-8E95-F57CFBECD0D8@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Different compression methods for FPI  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers

> 28 июня 2021 г., в 12:36, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> написал(а):
>
> Removing "allows_streaming => 1" in 011_crash_recovery.pl is enough to
> make the test fail on HEAD.  And the test fails equally without or
> without any changes related to wal_compression, so adding or removing
> options to wal_compression is not going to change anything with that.
> There is simply no relationship I can spot, though I may be missing of
> course an argument here.
There is no relationship at all. That test 011_crash_recovery.pl is failing depending on random fluctuation in WAL
size.Currently, it does not affect this thread anyhow (except for confusion I made by importing patch with fix from
otherthread, sorry). 


> Let's just discuss this recovery issue where
> it should be discussed (these are patches 0002 and 0003 in the patch
> v9 sent upthread):
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210308.173242.463790587797836129.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
+1.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Different compression methods for FPI
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: Overflow hazard in pgbench