Re: Streaming replication status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Streaming replication status
Date
Msg-id 9837222c1001120620s522e1945x6c79eca4ec55baf6@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Streaming replication status  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 15:13, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure whether poll(2) should be called for this purpose. But
>>> poll(2) and select(2) seem to often come together in the existing code.
>>> We should follow such custom?
>>>
>>
>> Yes.  poll() is usually more efficient, so it's preferred, but not all
>> platforms have it.  (On the other side, I think Windows might have
>> only poll and not select.)
>>
>>
>>
>
> No, other way around, I'm fairly sure.

Yeah, the emulation layer has select, not poll. It basically
translates the select into what looks very much like a poll, so maybe
we should consider implementing poll as well/instead. But for now,
select() is what we have.

-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Next
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs