Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Stale references to guc.c in comments/tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Stale references to guc.c in comments/tests
Date
Msg-id 97B5D701-696C-4018-8BB8-FBA294A9E4E4@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stale references to guc.c in comments/tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Stale references to guc.c in comments/tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> On 27 Feb 2023, at 17:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> The grammar is a bit off ("the GUC definition" would read better),
> but really I think the wording was vague already and we should tighten
> it up.  Can we specify exactly which GUC variable(s) we're talking about?

Specifying the GUCs in question is a good idea, done in the attached.  I'm not
sure the phrasing is spot-on though, but I can't think of a better one.  If you
can think of a better one I'm all ears.

--
Daniel Gustafsson
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: logical publication via inheritance root?
Next
From: "Regina Obe"
Date:
Subject: RE: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts