Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> Specifying the GUCs in question is a good idea, done in the attached. I'm not
> sure the phrasing is spot-on though, but I can't think of a better one. If you
> can think of a better one I'm all ears.
I'd just change "the definition of" to "the definitions of".
LGTM otherwise.
regards, tom lane