Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Larry Rosenman
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date
Msg-id 97870000.1063339322@lerlaptop.lerctr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:00:43 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:

> Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
>>> Please, only the first two.  Make the Unixware template add __i386__.
>>> Don't add assumptions about valid user-namespace symbols.
>
>> that's reasonable.  At least until 64-bit UnixWare. :-)
>
> Even then, I'd prefer to put the necessary kluge into template/unixware
> or Makefile.unixware or port/unixware.h, rather than add a risky
> assumption globally.
Sure, and 64-bit UnixWare is 2 years out any way.

Hopefully we can get reasonableness by then.

I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO.

LER

>
>             regards, tom lane



--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines