Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date
Msg-id 6487.1063339609@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
List pgsql-patches
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO.

Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add*
an implicit #define of __i386__ should be plenty easy compared
to getting them to *remove* the one for i386.  And while I think
they should remove the latter, the immediate problem would be
solved as soon as they add the former.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines