Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> I can get around the problem (I think) by using WHERE parent IN
>> (0,'-1').
> yes, that's a good workaround. Added to TODO list:
> * select * from pg_class where oid in (0,-1);
It's a grammar problem. in_expr_nodes and not_in_expr_nodes expect the
elements of the IN-list to be AexprConst ... I wonder why not a_expr
instead? Might be a reduce conflict, but I bet we could at least use
b_expr. Thomas, any comments?
regards, tom lane