Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend - Mailing list pgsql-admin

Because longer idle transactions are used by a bunch of processes, but it's a certain group of users I don't want having idle transactions, so here we are...

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:11 PM Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net> wrote:

Wells Oliver schrieb am 19.04.2023 um 21:41:
> I usually prefer pg_cancel_backend because it seems.. nicer, but
> lately I've had a troublesome user who leaves transactions open and
> I've scripted up a call to pg_terminate_backend after 60 minutes in
> an idle transaction. It works well.

Why don't you use the idle_in_transaction_session_timeout to do this automatically?

Actually, you can set this for certain users:

ALTER ROLE alice SET idle_in_transaction_session_timeout TO '100 s';

But the fact that this is possible implies that each session can set this parameter to any value, AFAIK. Correct me if I'm wrong.
--

Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach, Tel. +49-178-9759012