Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Benjamin Leis
Subject Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend
Date
Msg-id CADP9qHs6=7FxYzFOS869o9Dg8dbjDYrqJZqKQwBDp1OU=E0dfw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend  (Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-admin
We use pg_terminate within some monitoring code for all the long running things in our system with no issues. 

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023, 1:11 PM Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net> wrote:
Wells Oliver schrieb am 19.04.2023 um 21:41:
> I usually prefer pg_cancel_backend because it seems.. nicer, but
> lately I've had a troublesome user who leaves transactions open and
> I've scripted up a call to pg_terminate_backend after 60 minutes in
> an idle transaction. It works well.

Why don't you use the idle_in_transaction_session_timeout to do this automatically?



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Wells Oliver
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend
Next
From: Holger Jakobs
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend