On 1/7/25 23:57, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Here is a rebased patch for cfbot. AFAICT we are still pretty far from
> consensus on which approach to take, unfortunately.
>
For what it's worth, although I would have preferred the sub-linear
growth thing, I'd much rather have this than nothing.
And I have to admit that the proposed formulas were either too
convoluted or wrong.
This very patch is more straightforward. Please let me know if I can
help and how.
