Re: Client application name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Client application name
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10910150825h27e84a7ds5cb8d31664ed719d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Client application name  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Client application name
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Also, I am wondering exactly what you think psql would *do* with the
>>> parameter if it had it.  If the answer is "force the setting to be
>>> 'psql'", that's the wrong answer.  IMO you'd really want the environment
>>> variable to take precedence over that, if set.  But libpq considers the
>>> priority to go the other way.
>
>> Well in the psql case, it could flip that priority itself and only set
>> the value if the environment variable wasn't set - which I agree would
>> seem the right thing to do. On further thought, it would seem
>> reasonable to do the same in the other apps as well, so you could have
>> your backup script do something like "PGAPPLICATIONNAME="Nightly
>> backup" /usr/bin/pg_dump ..."
>
> Hmm.  Maybe this is a generic problem.  Should libpq offer some sort
> of help?  Maybe a "secondaryappname" parameter that doesn't override
> the env variable.

is it worth uglifying libpq? All we're talking about is something like:

if (!getenv("PGAPPLICATIONNAME"))   strncat(connstr, " application_name=psql", sizeof(connstr) -
strlen(connstr) - 1);


--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS