Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

15 October 2009

• 00:43   Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls Robert Haas
• 00:46   Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review) Robert Haas
• 00:54   Re: Review of "SQLDA support for ECPG" Robert Haas
• 00:55   Re: Triggers on columns Itagaki Takahiro
• 00:56   Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls KaiGai Kohei
• 01:07   Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls KaiGai Kohei
• 01:09   Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363) Robert Haas
• 01:18   Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review) Itagaki Takahiro
• 01:19   Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363) Tom Lane
• 01:20   Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on Robert Haas
• 01:22   Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363) KaiGai Kohei
• 01:24   Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review) Robert Haas
• 01:36   Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on KaiGai Kohei
• 01:38   Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review) Itagaki Takahiro
• 01:44   Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review) Robert Haas
• 01:45   Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on Robert Haas
• 02:11   Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls Robert Haas
• 02:13   Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363) Robert Haas
• 02:14   Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? Andrew Dunstan
• 02:20   Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? Tom Lane
• 03:20   Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls KaiGai Kohei
• 03:51   Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? Andrew Dunstan
• 04:13   Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? David Fetter
• 04:18   Re: Skip WAL in ALTER TABLE Itagaki Takahiro
• 05:05   Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? Tom Lane
• 06:20   Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls Heikki Linnakangas
• 06:35   Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:20   Re: Skip WAL in ALTER TABLE Simon Riggs
• 07:33   Hot standby status Heikki Linnakangas
• 07:54   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Dave Page
• 07:56   Re: Hot standby status Simon Riggs
• 08:02   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Dave Page
• 08:34   Re: Hot standby status Heikki Linnakangas
• 09:25   Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP) Itagaki Takahiro
• 11:29   EXPLAIN BUFFERS Itagaki Takahiro
• 11:38   Re: ECPG: store own copy of the prepared statement name Michael Meskes
• 11:49   Re: ECPG: store own copy of the prepared statement name Boszormenyi Zoltan
• 12:55   visual c++ compile error when included spi.h and trigger.h mingsoftt
• 13:07   Re: visual c++ compile error when included spi.h and trigger.h Peter Eisentraut
• 13:49   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Kevin Grittner
• 13:56   Re: Client application name Dave Page
• 14:08   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Dave Page
• 14:32   Re: Client application name Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 14:34   Re: Client application name Tom Lane
• 14:37   Re: Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP) Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: Client application name Dave Page
• 14:39   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Albe Laurenz
• 14:45   Re: Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP) Pavel Stehule
• 14:49   Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS Robert Haas
• 14:50   Re: Client application name Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls Robert Haas
• 14:53   Re: Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP) Tom Lane
• 15:06   Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS Tom Lane
• 15:25   Re: Client application name Dave Page
• 15:35   Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS Robert Haas
• 15:37   Re: Client application name Tom Lane
• 15:47   Re: Client application name Dave Page
• 16:09   Re: Client application name Tom Lane
• 16:24   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Mark Mielke
• 16:29   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Mark Mielke
• 16:39   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Mark Mielke
• 16:41   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Dave Page
• 17:00   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Ron Mayer
• 17:17   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Josh Berkus
• 17:19   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Robert Haas
• 17:22   Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363) Tom Lane
• 17:23   Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? Josh Berkus
• 17:44   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Tom Lane
• 17:44   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Dave Page
• 17:47   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Dave Page
• 17:55   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Robert Haas
• 18:03   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Dave Page
• 18:07   Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? David Fetter
• 18:12   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Mark Mielke
• 18:12   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Tom Lane
• 18:16   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Tom Lane
• 18:23   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Mark Mielke
• 18:54   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Dave Page
• 21:16   inefficient use of relation extension? Alvaro Herrera
• 21:40   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Ron Mayer
• 21:40   Re: inefficient use of relation extension? Tom Lane
• 21:44   Re: Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP) Dimitri Fontaine
• 21:54   Re: Trigger with WHEN clause (WIP) Kevin Grittner
• 22:13   Re: Rejecting weak passwords Dave Page
• 22:43   Hot standby, recovery_starts_paused Heikki Linnakangas
• 23:53   Re: inefficient use of relation extension? Alvaro Herrera
• 23:58   Re: inefficient use of relation extension? Tom Lane