On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While reading the code, the PGSet->MoveNext() definition seems to have a
> small bug.
>
> Since the PGSet->EOF() is defined as
> bool Eof() const { return (!nRows || pos > nRows); }
>
> I think it doesn't make sense to define PGSet->MoveNext() as
> void MoveNext() { if (pos <= nRows) pos++; }
>
> It should rather be
> void MoveNext() { if (pos < nRows) pos++; }
No - we define EOF as pos > nRows (or nRows == 0), therefore we need
to allow MoveNext() to move past the last row. This is to allow loops
like the following to work:
while (!rs.Eof())
{
// Do stuff
rs.MoveNext();
}
With the change you suggest, pos could never exceed nRows when changed
by MoveNext(), thus Eof() would only return true for a zero row set.
FWIW, this code has been there pretty much since v1.0.0 and we never
found ourselves losing or gaining any rows yet :-)
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
