Thanks for the suggestions. I am re-submitting the patch in contextual diff format.
As far as storage savings are concened, the patch claims whatever is stated. I checked it by creating a table with 10 columns on a 32 bit machine. i inserted 100,000 rows with trailing nulls and i observed savings of 400Kbytes.
I did a similar test for index and i found similar space saving.
I have tested regression in both 32 bit system and 64 bit system.
Please go through the patch and provide further suggestions.
--
Thanks,
Gokul.
CertoSQL Project,
Allied Solution Group.
(
www.alliedgroups.com)
