On 2/11/22 03:37, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> That being said, this thread was not really about foreign partitions,
> but about re-analyzing inheritance trees in general. And sampling
> foreign partitions doesn't really solve that - we'll still do the
> sampling over and over.
IMO, to solve the problem we should do two things:
1. Avoid repeatable partition scans in the case inheritance tree.
2. Avoid to re-analyze everything in the case of active changes in small
subset of partitions.
For (1) i can imagine a solution like multiplexing: on the stage of
defining which relations to scan, group them and prepare parameters of
scanning to make multiple samples in one shot.
It looks like we need a separate logic for analysis of partitioned
tables - we should form and cache samples on each partition before an
analysis.
It requires a prototype to understand complexity of such solution and
can be done separately from (2).
Task (2) is more difficult to solve. Here we can store samples from each
partition in values[] field of pg_statistic or in specific table which
stores a 'most probable values' snapshot of each table.
Most difficult problem here, as you mentioned, is ndistinct value. Is it
possible to store not exactly calculated value of ndistinct, but an
'expected value', based on analysis of samples and histograms on
partitions? Such value can solve also a problem of estimation of a SETOP
result grouping (joining of them, etc), where we have statistics only on
sources of the union.
--
regards,
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional
