Re: [HACKERS] PinBuffer() no longer makes use of strategy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Teodor Sigaev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PinBuffer() no longer makes use of strategy
Date
Msg-id 8fd788ef-8e69-e12e-2262-e5cd9d2a5078@sigaev.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PinBuffer() no longer makes use of strategy  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PinBuffer() no longer makes use of strategy  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>       if (buf->usage_count < BM_MAX_USAGE_COUNT)
>       if (BUF_STATE_GET_USAGECOUNT(buf_state) != BM_MAX_USAGE_COUNT)
>
>     being prone to paranoia, I prefer the first, but I've seen both styles in
>     the code so I don't know if it's worth futzing with.
>
>
> Ok, let's be paranoic and do this same way as before.  Revised patch is attached.

I see the change was done in 9.6 release cycle in commit 
48354581a49c30f5757c203415aa8412d85b0f70 at April, 10. Does it mean the fix 
should be backpatched too?

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
  WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regressiontests and code coverage
Next
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)