On 03 October 2013 19:30 Bruce Momjian wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:54:14AM +0530, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
>> Thanks Bruce.
>>
>> Yes for me main problem was to make assumption that a 5-digit number
>> is a year, as was bit worried about side effect of that assumption in
>> the date/time module. I did tested patch shared by you with various
>> test and so far it looks good to me.
>>
>> I would like reviewer to review/test the patch and share his comments.
>>
>> Attaching the git patch again with this mail.
>>
>> Assigning to Reviewer.
>Oh, great. If everyone likes it I can apply it.
With Year length of 6 digits has some inconsistency problem,
The tests are carried out on a default configuration.
select timestamptz '199910108 01:01:01 IST'; -- worksselect timestamptz '19991 01 08 01:01:01 IST'; -- worksselect
timestamptz'1999100108 01:01:01 IST'; -- worksselect timestamptz '199910 01 08 01:01:01 IST'; -- Not workingselect
timestamptz'January 8, 19991 01:01:01 IST'; -- worksselect timestamptz 'January 8, 199910 01:01:01 IST'; -- Not
workingCREATETABLE TIMESTAMPTZ_TST (a int , b timestamptz); INSERT INTO TIMESTAMPTZ_TST VALUES(1, '100000312 23:58:48
IST');-- worksINSERT INTO TIMESTAMPTZ_TST VALUES(2, '10000 03 12 23:58:48 IST'); -- worksINSERT INTO TIMESTAMPTZ_TST
VALUES(3,'1000000312 23:58:48 IST'); -- worksINSERT INTO TIMESTAMPTZ_TST VALUES(4, '100000 03 12 23:58:48 IST'); -- Not
working
please correct me if anything wrong in the tests.
Regards,
Hari babu.
