On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:54:14AM +0530, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
> Thanks Bruce.
>
> Yes for me main problem was to make assumption that a 5-digit number is a year,
> as was bit worried about side effect of that assumption in the date/time
> module. I
> did tested patch shared by you with various test and so far it looks good to
> me.
>
> I would like reviewer to review/test the patch and share his comments.
>
> Attaching the git patch again with this mail.
>
> Assigning to Reviewer.
Oh, great. If everyone likes it I can apply it.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
