Re: Static snapshot data - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Static snapshot data
Date
Msg-id 8959.1054569746@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Static snapshot data  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Static snapshot data  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> After lots of discussion, it seems this is to be applied.

I'm still concerned that this will create problems for nested
transactions, while saving only an insignificant number of cycles per
transaction.  I would suggest putting the idea on hold until the
dust has settled from nested transactions.  If it's still workable
after that feature is complete, we can shave cycles then.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GUC and postgresql.conf docs