Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > After lots of discussion, it seems this is to be applied.
>
> I'm still concerned that this will create problems for nested
> transactions, while saving only an insignificant number of cycles per
> transaction. I would suggest putting the idea on hold until the
> dust has settled from nested transactions. If it's still workable
> after that feature is complete, we can shave cycles then.
My feeling was that Manfred/Alvero are dealing with nested transactions,
so if they both want the patch applied, we apply it. If they want it
back, they can grab it from CVS.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
