Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
Hi,
> On 2021/04/10 7:42, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2021-Mar-24, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/committsdesc.c b/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/committsdesc.c
>>> index 7ebd3d35ef..26bad44b96 100644
>>> --- a/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/committsdesc.c
>>> +++ b/src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/committsdesc.c
>>> @@ -38,31 +38,6 @@ commit_ts_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
>>> appendStringInfo(buf, "pageno %d, oldestXid %u",
>>> trunc->pageno, trunc->oldestXid);
>>> }
>>> - else if (info == COMMIT_TS_SETTS)
>> You have not pushed this one, right? I think we should do it now.
>
> Thanks for the ping! Pushed!
Did this commit(08aa89b326261b669648df97d4f2a6edba22d26a) forget to
remove struct xl_commit_ts_set? After it, there is no reference to
xl_commit_ts_set. So Is it better clean them as well?
typedef struct xl_commit_ts_set
{
TimestampTz timestamp;
RepOriginId nodeid;
TransactionId mainxid;
/* subxact Xids follow */
} xl_commit_ts_set;
#define SizeOfCommitTsSet (offsetof(xl_commit_ts_set, mainxid) + \
(When going through commit_ts.h, these code makes me think there is a
dedicated xlog for commit_ts, but the fact isn't, the commit_ts is
recorded in xl_xact_commit, removing dead code could be useful for such
case).
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
