Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com> writes:
> What if I [try to] extend the grammar to support an additional ANALYZE
> in CLUSTER, so that it analyzes the table automatically?
I don't like this -- it seems like bloat. What's the advantage of
CLUSTER foo ON bar ANALYZE;
over
CLUSTER foo ON bar;
ANALYZE;
> Or maybe just do an analyze of the table automatically after the
> CLUSTERing.
Hmmm... I don't really see the problem with adding a note in the docs
suggesting that users following a CLUSTER with an ANALYZE (of course,
that assumes that the CLUSTER will significantly change the ordering
of the data in the table, which isn't always the case -- which is
another reason why make this automatic seems unwarranted, IMHO). It
seems like you're looking for a solution to a non-existent problem.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
