Re: porting horde to Postgresql 12, dropped pg_attrdef - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Laurenz Albe |
---|---|
Subject | Re: porting horde to Postgresql 12, dropped pg_attrdef |
Date | |
Msg-id | 87825b0142176995744d250a590659a1cfbf178e.camel@cybertec.at Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: porting horde to Postgresql 12, dropped pg_attrdef (Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it>) |
List | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 01:29 +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote: > On 11/15/19 4:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it> writes: > > > Horde (webmail and more) is not anymore compatible with postgresql 12 > > > after pg_attrdef was dropped. > > > > We didn't drop the whole catalog, just the adsrc column, which has been > > deprecated for ages (because it didn't update to track, eg, column > > renamings). The correct substitute for adsrc is > > > > pg_get_expr(adbin,adrelid) > > > > which reconstructs an up-to-date text form from the authoritative > > data. > > Thanks, that's a good starting. > Unfortunately even using that function requires a deeper understanding > of postgresql internals. > > I've found just examples that use pg_class table. > I'm guessing I should join information_schema.columns and pg_class, but > I don't know from where to start. The change should be pretty straightforward. For example, your first query would become: SELECT attr.attname, CASE WHEN split_part(def.adsrc, '''', 2) ~ '.' THEN substr(split_part(def.adsrc, '''', 2), strpos(split_part(def.adsrc, '''', 2), '.')+1) ELSE split_part(def.adsrc, '''', 2) END AS relname FROM pg_class t JOIN pg_attribute attr ON (t.oid = attrelid) JOIN (SELECT adrelid, adnum, pg_get_expr(adbin, adrelid) AS adsrc FROM pg_attrdef ) AS def ON (adrelid = attrelid AND adnum = attnum) JOIN pg_constraint cons ON (conrelid = adrelid AND adnum = conkey[1]) WHERE t.oid = '<tablename>'::regclass AND cons.contype = 'p' AND def.adsrc ~* 'nextval'; It would be *much* better to use the "pg_get_serial_sequence" function. I think that the limitation to single-column primary keys is, er, unfortunate. > While I do understand that since every DB may have it's own data type > and of course you may have to use a function that may not be part of the > standard using pg_get_expr() doesn't seem to help that much in isolating > postgresql internals or hiding them as much as possible. I think that this is not an attempt at hiding internals, on the contrary: it makes the internals palatable. > For query 1) if there is no better way I'd prefer to use information > schema and just pg_get_serial_sequence(). That will also get rid of > messing up with strings. Any better way that completely avoid postgresql > specific functions will be appreciated. Yes, that would certainly be better. The tables in pg_catalog can change from version to version. I think that it will be difficult to avoid PostgreSQL-specific constructs to get the sequence name behind a serial column, since both "serial" and "nextval" are PostgreSQL specific. The canonical way from a column to the associated sequence is via dependencies in "pg_depend", which is a PostgreSQL-specific thing too. > For query 2) I didn't find enough clues on how to use pg_get_expr(). SELECT a.attname, format_type(a.atttypid, a.atttypmod), pg_get_expr(d.adbin, d.adrelid) AS adsrc, a.attnotnull FROM pg_attribute a LEFT JOIN pg_attrdef d ON a.attrelid = d.adrelid AND a.attnum = d.adnum WHERE a.attrelid = '<tablename>'::regclass AND a.attnum > 0 AND NOT a.attisdropped ORDER BY a.attnum; > If I could avoid using pg_get_expr() I'd have one more concern left > since the original query returns > > nextval('public.horde_alarms_id_seq'::regclass) > > while interrogating information_schema.columns returns > > nextval('horde_alarms_id_seq'::regclass) That is because of your "search_path" setting. Schemas are only shown if they are *not* on your "search_path". You can set "search_path" to an empty string to always get the schema. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
pgsql-general by date: