Re: Is this portable? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: Is this portable?
Date
Msg-id 877isumrsb.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is this portable?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Is this portable?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Is this portable?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Can I declare a struct in a function's declaration section?
>
>> It works fine with Sun Studio 11.
>
> AFAICT it's required by the original K&R C book.

IIRC there's something odd about the scope of the declared struct label.

Something like it previously extended to the end of the file but post-ANSI was
limited to the scope it's declared in (including very limited scopes where it
would be useless such as in function parameters).


--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is this portable?
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: CheckpointStartLock starvation