Re: Is this portable? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Is this portable?
Date
Msg-id 28899.1175549458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is this portable?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> IIRC there's something odd about the scope of the declared struct label.

> Something like it previously extended to the end of the file but post-ANSI was
> limited to the scope it's declared in (including very limited scopes where it
> would be useless such as in function parameters).

I think you might be thinking of the use of a previously unreferenced
"struct foo" in a function declaration's parameter list, which is
something that did change (and so gcc warns about it).  But within a
block is not that case.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Invalid to_date patterns (was: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] ISO week dates)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CheckpointStartLock starvation