"Ron Peterson" <ron.peterson@yellowbank.com> writes:
> 2007-10-13_08:50:56-0400 Ron Peterson <ron.peterson@yellowbank.com>:
>> 2007-10-13_01:22:06-0400 Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>:
>
>> > And normally you would define your own datatype and not use bytea.
>>
>> Actually, I already have my data in a structure much like varlena.
>
> Pght, I misunderstood what you were saying. You mean create a
> full-blown new type. I was thinking completely internally. Yeah,
> that's probably a better approach - I'll do that.
Or you could just define new functions which operate on bytea if you're just
storing binary data.
I don't understand what you mean with "internally" if you're storing this in
tuples?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
