"Chris Ochs" <chris@paymentonline.com> writes:
> My preferred method is to have a function for each table that I do an insert
> into, it's easier to manage that way and a lot easier to make changes if I
> add/drop columns and tables. Right now I have one function that is called
> by my application that in turn calls all the other functions.
>
> I am wondering is there is a significant overhead for calling say 10
> functions from within a function compared to putting everything into one
> single function?
Compared to the disk I/O overhead for a transaction, it'd be lost in
the noise--do whatever makes you happy. :)
-Doug
