"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> I'm pretty sure a lot of people would initially be confused why anyone would
> write time in meters, let alone those that might associate it with memory
> units. In my subjective view (and I acknowledge that we have all been
> educated in different ways), writing "1m" for a time quantity is meaningless
> and an error.
That's an argument for why Postgres maybe shouldn't print times with "m" for
minutes -- though I for one would prefer it. Or why it might not be a
particularly good idea for a sysadmin to use "m" given the choice.
But to argue that Postgres should refuse "m" when presented with it you would
have to say there's a substantial chance that the user didn't mean minutes and
that there was a risk Postgres would do something bad that outweighs giving
users who do want minutes getting what they want.
Frankly, I think I see "m" as an abbreviation for minutes *more* often than
"min" anyways. I see times written as 2h30m quite frequently and then there's
precedent like this:
$ time echo
real 0m0.000s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
