Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date
Msg-id 200706182002.54069.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Montag, 18. Juni 2007 19:03 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Standard according to whom?

ISO 31 a.k.a. SI

> In time-related contexts (eg ISO 8601) I'd expect just "h" "m" and "s".

ISO 8601 appears to use a slightly different syntax for writing timespans.  I 
would not object if anyone added support for that.

> Since there's no likelihood that anyone would think autovacuum_naptime 
> is measured in meters, I think insisting that it must not be written as
> "1m" is just pedantry.

I'm pretty sure a lot of people would initially be confused why anyone would 
write time in meters, let alone those that might associate it with memory 
units.  In my subjective view (and I acknowledge that we have all been 
educated in different ways), writing "1m" for a time quantity is meaningless 
and an error.

Standards exist for these things, and we have a fine tradition for choosing 
standards in favor of randomness.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent