Performance problems with DISTINCT ON - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Sgarbossa Domenico
Subject Performance problems with DISTINCT ON
Date
Msg-id 86BD52C4247C45E6B14A460BB962CB93@laneniac.it
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Performance problems with DISTINCT ON  (imad <immaad@gmail.com>)
Re: Performance problems with DISTINCT ON  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
 
I need to retrieve the most recent prices per products from a price list table:
 
CREATE TABLE listini_anagrafici
(
  id character varying(36) NOT NULL,
  articolo character varying(18),
  listino character varying(5),
  data_ent date,
  data_fin date,
  prezzo double precision,
  ultimo boolean DEFAULT false,
  date_entered timestamp without time zone NOT NULL,
  date_modified timestamp without time zone NOT NULL,
  created_by character varying(36),
  modified_user_id character varying(36) NOT NULL,
  deleted boolean NOT NULL DEFAULT false,
  CONSTRAINT listini_anagrafici_id_key UNIQUE (id)
)
 
I guess the right query is:
 
select distinct on (articolo) articolo,data_ent,prezzo from listini_anagrafici order by articolo, data_ent desc
 
but it seems that this query runs slowly... about 5/6 seconds.
the table contains more or less 500K records, PostgreSQL version is 8.1.11 and the server has 4gb of RAM entirely dedicate to the db.
 
I've tried adding this index
 
CREATE INDEX articolo_data_ent ON listini_anagrafici (articoli, data_ent)
 
but it doesn't helps.
 
As you can see from the explain command (below) the query seems to ignore the index
 
'Unique  (cost=73897.58..76554.94 rows=77765 width=24)'
'  ->  Sort  (cost=73897.58..75226.26 rows=531472 width=24)'
'        Sort Key: articolo, data_ent'
'        ->  Seq Scan on listini_anagrafici  (cost=0.00..16603.72 rows=531472 width=24)'
 
anyone knows how to make this query run faster?
 
 
 

 

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Bill Kirtley
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of sequence rather than index scan for one text column on one instance of a database
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 8.3 and large shared buffer settings