Re: Yet another fast GiST build - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey M. Borodin
Subject Re: Yet another fast GiST build
Date
Msg-id 8516B6A8-11B2-41A8-B7EB-D0C38ADD06C3@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Yet another fast GiST build  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: Yet another fast GiST build  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers

> 9 сент. 2020 г., в 20:39, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> написал(а):
>
> On 09/09/2020 15:20, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:09 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>>> Come to think of it, the point z-order comparator could benefit a lot
>>> from key abbreviation, too. You could do the point -> zorder conversion
>>> in the abbreviation routine.
>> That's how it works in PostGIS, only that we moved to more
>> effecient Hilbert curve:
>> https://github.com/postgis/postgis/blob/54399b9f6b0f02e8db9444f9f042b8d4ca6d4fa4/postgis/lwgeom_btree.c#L171
>
> Thanks, that's interesting.
>
> I implemented the abbreviated keys for the point opclass, too, and noticed that the patch as it was never used it. I
reworkedthe patch so that tuplesort_begin_index_gist() is responsible for looking up the sortsupport function, like
tuplesort_begin_index_btree()does, and uses abbreviation when possible. 
Wow, abbreviated sort made gist for points construction even 1.5x faster!
btw there is small typo in arg names in gist_bbox_zorder_cmp_abbrev(); z1,z2 -> a,b

> do we have regression test coverage for this?
Yes, sorting build for points is tested in point.sql, but with small dataset. index_including_gist.sql seems to be
workingwith boxes, but triggers point paths too. 

> , also on a SIZEOF_DATUM==4 system since the abbreviation works differently with that, and push if nothing new comes
up.And clarify the documentation and/or comments that the sortsupport function sees "compressed" values. 
>
> I wonder if we could use sorting to also speed up building tsvector indexes? The values stored there are bit
signatures,what would be a good sort order for those? 
We need an order so that nearby values have a lot of bits in common.
What is the length of this signature?
For each 4 bytes we can compute number of 1s in it's binary representation. Then z-order these dwords as values 0-32.

This will be very inefficient grouping, but it will tend to keep empty and dense 4-byte regions apart.

Thanks for working on this!


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove line length restriction in passwordFromFile()
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove line length restriction in passwordFromFile()