On 2022-04-14 18:57, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 14 Apr 2022, at 09:42, Shinya Kato <Shinya11.Kato@oss.nttdata.com>
>> wrote:
>
>> To add the ROLE clause, the originally existing --role option
>> (corresponding to the IN ROLE clause) is changed to the --in-role
>> option. Would this not be good from a backward compatibility
>> standpoint?
>
> - printf(_(" -g, --role=ROLE new role will be a member of
> this role\n"));
> + printf(_(" -g, --in-role=ROLE new role will be a member of
> this role\n"));
> + printf(_(" -G, --role=ROLE this role will be a member of
> new role\n"));
>
> Won't this make existing scripts to behave differently after an
> upgrade? That
> seems like something we should avoid at all costs.
I understand. For backward compatibility, I left the ROLE clause option
as it is and changed the IN ROLE clause option to --membership option.
--
Regards,
--
Shinya Kato
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
